Legal Opinion

Head v. National Super Markets, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1995No. 66645PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

This is a slip and fall case. Plaintiff, Cel-estine Head, appeals from the trial court’s grant of directed verdict, after the close of her evidence, in favor of defendant, National Super Markets, Inc. We reverse and remand.

In reviewing a directed verdict granted in favor of defendant, the appellate court views the evidence and permissible inferences most favorably to the plaintiff, disregards contrary evidence and inferences, and determines whether plaintiff made a sub-missible case. Friend v. Holman, 888 S.W.2d 369, 371 (Mo.App.W.D.1994). Directing a verdict is a drastic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. Sheil v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Moss v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Ivan Spencer v. Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Friend v. HolmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Emery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Morrison v. St. Luke's Health Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Meek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Mathis v. Jones Store Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Grothe v. HelterbrandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API