Legal Opinion
Auto Alarm Supply Corp. v. Lou Fusz Motor Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1996No. 68139PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHODES RUSSELL, Judge.
Auto Alarm Supply Corp. (“Auto Alarm”) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its conversion and replevin claims against Lou Fusz Motor Co. (“Lou Fusz”) for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse and remand.
Auto Alarm alleged the following facts in its first amended petition. On November 16, 1992, Donovan Hansen (“Hansen”) brought a 1990 Ford Mustang that he had allegedly purchased from Lou Fusz to Auto Alarm and made a written request that Auto Alarm expend materials and labor on the vehicle. The amount of the charges for the services was $1,364.89. After…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Hughes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Johnson v. Kraft General Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Anderson v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Citizens National Bank of Fort ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Hazelwood Yellow Ribbon Committee v. KlosMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Geiger v. BowersoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Ferrell Mobile Homes, Inc. v. HollowayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lemay Fire Protection District v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.