Legal Opinion

Weintraub v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1983PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*340OPINION OF THE COURT

Mollen, P. J.

The primary question to be resolved on these appeals is whether the parents of an unwanted, but otherwise healthy and normal child, may recover the ordinary costs of raising that child as damages resulting from the defendants’ negligence in the performance of a surgical birth control procedure, and, thereafter, in the performance of studies to determine whether the procedure was a success. We begin with a brief review of the facts.

Paul and Rosemary Weintraub, the plaintiffs, instituted this medical malpractice action, alleging that in or about May, 1978,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Howard v. LecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Coleman v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Smith v. GoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  3. O'Toole v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Byrd v. Wesley Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. McKernan v. AasheimWashington Supreme Court · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API