Legal Opinion

Rieck v. Medical Protective Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1974No. 99PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

This is an action for damages based on the birth of a normal child, healthy and well. The action is brought by the father who sired and the mother who bore the baby boy against a clinic and the obstetrician who allegedly failed to determine and timely inform the mother that she was pregnant.

The basis of the parents’ action is that the child, their fourth, was an unwanted addition to the family circle. There is no allegation that the child, once born, is or will continue to be an unwelcome member of the family household. Nor is there any allegation that the parents sought to terminate their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hass v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Terrell v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Howard v. Mt. Sinai Hospital, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Shaheen v. Knight, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1957

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Schuster v. AltenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API