Legal Opinion

People v. Sesslin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1968No. Crim. No. 11519PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

An information charged defendant and Frank Harper with seven counts of forgery and two counts of grand theft. Defendant and Harper waived trial by jury and stipulated that the trial judge decide the ease on the transcript of the preliminary hearing. The trial court found defendant guilty of one count of forgery and dismissed the other eight counts against defendant. Defendant appeals.

We hold that (1) an arrest warrant issued solely upon the complainant’s “information and belief” cannot stand if the complaint or an accompanying affidavit does not allege underlying facts upon which the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. BittakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. BelmontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API