Legal Opinion
State v. McCook
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 1929PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The applicable part of the Act upon which the petition in this action is based we quote in the footnote. It is designated by the State as a Special Act and is printed among the Special Acts. If the purpose of the Act is to provide for the acquiring of land for the tuberculosis sanatorium at East Lyme it is, as we would take judicial notice, a Public Act since the sanatorium is an institution of the State for the care and alleviation of all persons within the State afflicted with tuberculosis, without discrimination.
Neither in form or substance does this Act resemble the ordinary grant of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Connecticut River Railroad v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Board of Water Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- The People v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Stock v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.