Legal Opinion

Thompson v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1990No. 88-385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Douglas County dismissing the claim of plaintiffs-appellants, who are employees of the City of Omaha, for overtime wages earned but uncompensated during the 5-year period preceding the filing of the petition in the district court. Plaintiffs’ petition included a prayer for costs and attorney fees under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-1231 (Reissue 1988) of the Nebraska Wage Payment and Collection Act. Defendants-appellees are the City of Omaha and various officials of the city, herein collectively called the city. We affirm.

A stipulation by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Omaha Parking Authority v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bolan v. BoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 1 v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Omaha Public Schools v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Halbleib v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoiengs v. County of AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hawkins v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rauscher v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sinn v. City of SewardNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. City of Lincoln, Neb. v. WINDSTREAM NEBRASKA, INC.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API