Legal Opinion

Bolan v. Boyle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1986No. 85-201PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiffs, Patrick J. Bolán and Marcellus Deats, appeal the dismissal of their suit against Michael Boyle; the City of Omaha (City), a municipal corporation; and others. In an earlier case involving these same parties, Bolan v. Boyle, 218 Neb. 85, 352 N.W.2d 586 (1984) (Bolan I), the defendants were described as officials of the City and the City and were referred to collectively as the City. We use the same nomenclature herein. In Bolán I this court held that plaintiffs were entitled to be compensated for the entire time they were at work for the City, and reversed and remanded for further…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Riedy v. RiedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Moell v. Mennonite Deaconess Home & Hospital, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schmitt v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bolan v. BoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andrews v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Coffelt v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sinn v. City of SewardNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Banks v. Mercy Villa Care CenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jackson v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API