Hamilton v. Bell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer-County and from an order denying a new trial. J. E. Prewitt,, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The question for decision arises out of the following facts: In May, 1891, the “Auburn Opera House and Pavilion Association” brought suit against George M. Hill to recover the sum of one thousand dollars, claimed to be due upon contract, and caused a writ of attachment to be issued therein under which money and other property was attached. On September 22, 1891, on the application of the defendant in said action, the court fixed the amount of the bond or undertaking for the re delivery of the attached property at fifteen hundred dollars, and the defendants in this action became the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gass v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Loveland v. Alvord Consolidated Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Auburn Opera House & Pavilion Ass'n v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aigeltinger v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bulmash v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Snow v. DuxstadWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
- Primm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.