Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Alvord Consolidated Quartz Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1888No. 12446PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

The appellant commenced an action in the justice’s court against J. T. Kenworthy and H. S. *564Loveland, and in that action caused an attachment to issue and be levied upon 8,706 shares of the capital stock of the Alvord Consolidated Quartz Mining Company as the property of said Kenworthy. In due time said action was tried in said justice’s court, and judgment was rendered in favor of defendants therein. From that judgment the plaintiff in said action, respondent here, appealed to the superior court, where he recovered judgment against said defendants. Pending said appeal in the superior court,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Aigeltinger v. WhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bulmash v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Green v. HooperNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Primm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Clark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API