Legal Opinion

Aigeltinger v. Whelan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1901No. S.F. No. 1800PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial and from an order modifying the judgment. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action is brought by the assignee of the defendants in an attachment suit against the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, and the sureties on his official bond, for damages arising out of a failure on the part of said sheriff to safely keep the attached property of the said defendants in said attachment suit and to restore the same to said defendants on demand after judgment rendered in their favor.

The plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appealed from the same and from an order denying them a new trial and also from an order modifying said judgment.

The undisputed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Urton v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. O'Connor v. BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Loveland v. Alvord Consolidated Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hawber v. RaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Bee v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cliff v. GleasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Reynolds v. LermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Primm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API