Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Maryland

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 1999No. 40, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The petitioner, Jorge Hernandez (Hernandez), was convicted in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of child abuse and second degree rape. At trial Hernandez testified in Spanish, through an interpreter. Hernandez here contends that the trial court improperly refused to propound his requested voir dire question sixteen, reading, “Is there any member of the panel who would be prejudiced against a defendant because of any defendant’s race, color, religion, sexual orientation, appearance, or sex?” As more fully explained below, because prejudice based on race was raised by the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Saint Francis College v. Al-KhazrajiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Curtin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API