Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexicole, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2004No. 2004-1585PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On August 2, 2002, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, charged that respondents, Bandali Dahdah and Alexicole, Inc., had together engaged in the unauthorized practice of law by representing Ohioans in securities-arbitration proceedings. The parties thereafter submitted stipulations of fact and a waiver of notice and hearing pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(7)(C). After striking respondents’ answer because it was not prepared and filed by a licensed attorney, however, the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law considered the cause on relator’s motion for default. See Gov.Bar R.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. KolodnerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Clapp & Affiliates Financial Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clapp & Affliliates Fin. Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Emhoff v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Nisha, LLC v. Tribuilt Construction Group, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Dayton Supply & Tool Co. v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Greenway Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API