Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2006No. 2004-0817PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} On December 15, 2004, we determined that “[n]onlawyers who appear and practice in a representative capacity before the Industrial Commission and the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation in conformity to Industrial Commission Resolution No. R04-1-01 are not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. CompManagement, Inc. (“CompManagement I ”), 104 Ohio St.3d 168, 2004-Ohio-6506, 818 N.E.2d 1181, syllabus. We are asked to clarify Industrial Commission Resolution No. R04-1-01 and its effect on lay representation in workers’ compensation claims.

Procedural History

{¶ 2}…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Union Savings Ass'n v. Home Owners Aid, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Porter v. Frutta Del Mondo, Ltd., 08ap-69 (7-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Emhoff v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API