Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Greenway Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2018No. 2017-0297Published

1ConcurrenceFischer, J.

{¶ 28} I agree in full with the majority opinion and concur in its judgment that the filing submitted by Scott Sweeney to appellee and cross-appellant Cuyahoga County Board of Revision ("BOR") did not invoke the BOR's jurisdiction, because he is neither an attorney nor a person who holds a position at a corporation that allows him, pursuant to R.C. 5715.19(A), to file on behalf of a corporation.

*799{¶ 29} I write separately, however, to draw attention to this court's prior determination that the legislature may authorize certain nonlawyers to file valuation complaints on behalf of property owners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Marysville Exempted Village School District Board of Education v. Union County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Emhoff v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexicole, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API