Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2003No. 2002-1380PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Bruce A. Brown, a.k.a. Bruce Andrew Brown, was admitted to the practice of law in New York in 1985. He was disbarred in New York. Matter of Brown (1992), 181 A.D.2d 314, 586 N.Y.S.2d 607. Respondent has never been admitted to the practice of law in Ohio. In 1992, the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law (“board”) found that respondent had engaged in conduct in Ohio constituting the unauthorized practice of law. Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown (1992), 61 Ohio Misc.2d 792, 584 N.E.2d 1391.

{¶2} Thereafter, a jury convicted respondent of 44 felonies based on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Alexicole, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. RobsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API