Legal Opinion

Upton v. Trinidad Petroleum Corp.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided March 26, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-M-0262PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McFADDEN, Chief Judge.

This cause was tried by the court without a jury. This memorandum opinion is being issued in lieu of findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff seeks damages, both compensatory and punitive in connection with the purchase of an interest in a gas well which he claims violated the securities laws of the United States and the State of Alabama.

This court has subject matter jurisdiction under § 22 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77v, and § 27 of the Securities Act of 1934, 15…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. A.S. GOLDMEN & COMPANY, INC. v. NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Nichols v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & SmithDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
  3. LeCroy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1984
  4. McCullough v. Leede Oil & Gas, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Wilson v. Southward Investment Co. 1Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API