Legal Opinion
LeCroy v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided February 1, 1984No. LR-C-81-415PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EISELE, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
This case involves the salé of certain securities by Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., the defendant, to Ms. Ruth LeCroy, the plaintiff. Ms. LeCroy’s complaint includes nine causes of action premised on the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Arkansas Securities Act of 1959, and the Arkansas common law theories of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,366 Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc., James F. Pritchard, Benjamin A. Cook v. Avien, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Morley v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- American Federation of State Employees v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Deloitte & ToucheDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Waterman v. Alta Verde Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.