State of Minnesota v. S. A. M.

OPINION

REILLY, Judge. ■

Appellant S.A.M. challenges the district court’s denial of his petition for expungement. Appellant argues that although he was convicted of a felony offense not enumerated in MinmStat. § 609A.02, subd. 3(b), he qualifies for relief under Minn. Stat. § 609A.02, subd. 3(a)(3), governing misdemeanor offenses because his felony conviction was later deemed a misdemean- or conviction following his discharge from probation. We affirm.

FACTS

In December 2003, respondent State of Minnesota charged appellant S.A.M. with second-degree burglary in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.582,…