Legal Opinion

Brothers v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

In February, 1929, D. B. Brothers, respondent was granted a permit by the Public Service Commission of Oregon to operate a Chevrolet truck as a Class 5 Motor Carrier and, as such, respondent registered with the Secretary of State and in all respects complied with the law regarding such class of Motor Carriers.

In July of 1929, Karl J. Stackland, a fruit grower of Union county, engaged respondent to haul certain freight with said truck, which consisted chiefly of hauling cherries from the Stackland Orchards near Cove to La Grande. There were several kinds of cherries in the lot to be moved.

As…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Farrin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Becker v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Honeyman v. Oregon & California R. R.Oregon Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Sloan v. Journal Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Harris v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API