Legal Opinion
Neptune Park Assn. v. Steinberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 20, 1951PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The question involved in this appeal is whether the use being made of the defendants’ real estate is violative either of a restrictive covenant contained in their deed or of the zoning regulations applying to the area in which their property is located.
The following facts were properly found by the trial court: The defendants are owners as tenants in common of a building lot, with a fourteen-room house thereon, at 33 Mott Avenue in New London. The lot is within a real estate development laid out in 1907. The portion of the development in which the lot is situated is known as Neptune Park. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hooker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Lenox Realty Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Hall v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Piccinim v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Scribner v. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In Re Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Knadler v. AdamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.