Legal Opinion
Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 23, 2004No. SC 16892PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The defendants, Benistar Property Exchange Trust Company, Inc. (Benistar Property), Benistar, Ltd., and Daniel E. Carpenter, appeal, upon our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s decision granting the application filed by the plaintiff, Gail A. Cahaly, for a prejudgment remedy against the defendants. Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co., 73 Conn. App. 267, 269, 812 A.2d 1 (2002). The defendants claim that the Appellate Court improperly *266affirmed the trial court’s decision because: (1) the prejudgment remedy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Milford Power Co v. Alstom Power, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- American International Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Padron v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Morris v. Cee Dee, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.