Legal Opinion
Penske Logistics, Inc. v. KLLM, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 22, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-5365PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon a motion for summary judgment and a cross motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff Penske Logistics, Inc. (“Plaintiff’) filed a motion for summary judgment for indemnification against defendant KLLM, Inc. (“Defendant”) based on a contract between the parties. Defendant thereafter filed a cross motion for partial summary judgment, limiting the amount of liability based on the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706. This matter is decided upon the written submissions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Orson, Inc. T/a Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film Corp. Orson, Inc., D/b/a/ Roxy Screening RoomsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2003
- Usinor Steel Corp. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- TIG Insurance v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Emerson Electric Supply Co. v. Estes Express Lines Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Spray-Tek, Inc. v. Robbins Motor Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.