Legal Opinion

Emerson Electric Supply Co. v. Estes Express Lines Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-0885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CONTI, District Judge.

Pending before this court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff Emerson Electric Supply Company (“plaintiff’) and defendant Estes Express Lines Corporation (“defendant”). This action arises under the Carmack Amend ment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14706, et seq. (“Carmack Amendment”). The Carmack Amendment imposes absolute liability upon a carrier for the value of goods lost or damaged during shipment, but it has a narrow exception that permits a carrier to limit its liability so long as the carrier meets certain…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  2. Chartis Seguros Mexico, S.A. de C.V. v. HLI Rail & Rigging, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Medvend, Inc. v. YRC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API