Legal Opinion
Paulsen v. Continental Porsche Audi, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 15, 1980No. 192739, CA 17023PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J. PRO TEMPORE
The plaintiff has appealed from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant. We reverse and remand.
The undisputed facts show that the plaintiff on August 15,1978, delivered his automobile to the defendant to have it repaired. The defendant itemized the repairs to be made on a printed form repair order. The following disclaimer was contained in the printed portion of the order:
"NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO CARS OR ARTICLES LEFT IN CARS IN CASE OF FIRE, THEFT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE BEYOND OUR CONTROL.
X_
CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT”
The plaintiff did not sign the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yartzoff v. Democrat-Herald Pub. Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Mezyk v. National Repossessions, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Bella v. Aurora Air, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lords v. NewmanMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Henderson-Rubio v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Lusk v. Monaco Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Andrews v. R.W. Hays Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Huitt v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.