Legal Opinion

Huitt v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1982No. 6591, CA A21046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, J., Pro Tempore.

Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that defendant is indebted to plaintiff in the amount of $4,000 and asked for a judgment for that amount plus interest. Plaintiff was granted summary judgment, and defendant appeals. We reverse.

Defendant’s answer admitted that he borrowed the money from plaintiff but alleged that “during the month of March, 1979, defendant gave to Bonnie Ann Smith, his wife and the sister of plaintiff, $4,000 to be paid to plaintiff in payment of the money loaned to defendant and defendant was never informed that the money was not paid to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Santilli v. State Farm Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. AugterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Wood v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Diamond v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Duncan v. AugterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API