Lusk v. Monaco Motor Homes, Inc.

*184GRABER, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant, his former employer,1 in this personal injury case. The trial court held that plaintiffs exclusive remedy is under the Workers’ Compensation Law. Plaintiff alleged that defendant deliberately intended to produce the injury that he suffered, but the trial court held that there was no genuine issue of material fact that would support that assertion. We reverse.

We state the facts most favorably to plaintiff, drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor. State ex rel Redden v. Will. Recreation, 54 Or App 156, 159, 634 P2d 286…