Legal Opinion

Blanchette v. Sargent

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

It is conceded that the rights of the parties are governed by the Vermont statute (P. L., Vt., c. 211, s. 5113) which provides that “The owner or operator of a motor vehicle shall not be liable in damages for injuries received by any occupant of the same occasioned by reason of the operation of such vehicle unless such owner or operator has received or contracted to receive pay for the carriage of such occupant, or unless such injuries are caused by the gross or wilful negligence of the operator.”

The plaintiff’s son, Edward Blanchette, who was agent for a building contractor in Concord,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Higgins, Admr. v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Franzoni v. RavennaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Hunter v. PrestonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. L'Ecuyer v. FarnsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Duncan v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Wagnon v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Dufton v. Mechanicks National BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API