Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Preston

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSlack, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries that she sustained when defendant Midgley’s ear in which she was riding as a guest passenger collided with a car operated by defendant Preston about 8.30 o’clock in the evening of December 25, 1931, on North Avenue in the city of Burlington.

The declaration as amended alleges, in substance, in paragraph 2, that defendant Hinsdale drove his car south on said avenue and parked it, unattended, on the westerly part of the traveled portion of the street in a manner to prevent a car passing in either direction- on that street provided another car…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  2. Sorrell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Woodcock's Admr. v. HallockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Bradley v. BlandinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
  5. Drown v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1907

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stone v. RudolphWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Conway v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Packard v. QuesnelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Hall v. RoyceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  5. Giguere, Admr. v. RosselotSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API