Dufton v. Mechanicks National Bank
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.
The granting of the motion for a nonsuit concerning the count in assumpsit was error. There was evidence from which the jury could find that the plaintiff’s version of the telephone conversation on August 21 was correct. If Mr. Dalton, at the request of the plaintiff, did agree to have extended the insurance for the remaining term of the loan, it would follow as a matter of law under the circumstances that the plaintiff impliedly agreed to pay a reasonable charge for the service. Restatement, Contracts, s. 5, comment a, Illustration 1; Blanchette v. Sargent, 87 N. H. 15, 16; Elliot Hospital…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. Waisman Bros.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- Busick v. Home Owners Loan Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Whipple v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
- Peaslee v. DudleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884
- Blanchette v. SargentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- O. R. Mitchell Motors, Inc. v. Joe Marotta & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962