Estey v. Mawdsley
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKinmonth, J.
This action was brought under § 52-435 of the General Statutes.1 The issues were *492found for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed, assigning error in the court’s finding and in its conclusion that a married woman could maintain a cause of action under the statute. The defendant abandoned his attack on the finding, and the only question before us is whether a married woman can maintain a cause of action under the statute in effect when this action was commenced.
The facts essential to the question before us may be briefly stated as follows: The plaintiff separated from her husband in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- City of Hartford v. Town of SuffieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Evans v. State ex rel. FreemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. FlynnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilkins v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- J.A.S. v. BushelmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Perkins v. PerkinsConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
- Lewis v. SchneiderColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Evans v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.