Legal Opinion
City of Hartford v. Town of Suffield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 12, 1950PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
The plaintiff’s appeal from a judgment for the defendant after its demurrer to the complaint was sustained presents a single question of interpretation of § 247f of the 1941 Supplement to the General Statutes. The gist of the complaint as amended is that a pauper belonging to' and settled in Suffield has lived in Hartford since 1931 and has not been other than a pauper for any four consecutive years during that period; that Hartford has furnished him necessary support; that on December 22, 1933, Hartford gave written notice to Suffield that he was chargeable to it; that Hartford has duly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. Kansas City, St. Louis & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- General Petroleum Corp. of Cal. v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- General Realty Improvement Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- People ex rel. Eckerson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Baker v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Brown v. CatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Tax Commissioner v. Estate of BissellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Atwood v. Regional School District No. 15Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.