Legal Opinion

Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 29, 1957PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWynne, J.

There is no dispute on the facts. By an application filed September 12,1956, the plaintiff,, a public service company, sought authority to issue 679,012 additional shares, of the par value of $25 each, of its authorized capital stock. Hearings were held by the public utilities commission on September 24, 25 and 26,1956, at which the company offered evidence in support of its application. The only person appearing in opposition was a stockholder who objected only so far as the offering price per share exceeded the par value of the stock. The company proposed to offer the additional shares for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hartley v. VitielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. State Ex Rel. Pac. T. T. Co. v. D.P.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Coombs v. DarlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. State ex rel. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public ServiceWashington Supreme Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  2. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. City of Waterbury v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Fusco-Amatruda Co. v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Holmquist v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API