Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reynolds v. Flynn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

Three questions are presented for consideration here: (1) May a nonresident prosecute a statutory action for bastardy against a resident of this state? (2) Can a married woman prosecute the action under our statute? (3) Was the magistrate without jurisdiction to hold the defendant for trial, there being no evidence before him except that given by the complainant, it appearing that the complainant was at the time of the examination and now is a married woman, and that the child was born in wedlock?

Upon the first- proposition there is a considerable conflict of authority due to the wording of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Commonwealth v. DornesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Mink v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Watts v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Goetz v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Collier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Werlein v. ElamoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Korne v. WolkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Tail v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API