Huizenga v. Withey Sheppard Associates
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTemplin, J.
This is an action arising out of a breach of an agreement to purchase land wherein the sellers, plaintiffs-appellants herein, were denied relief by the lower court against the realtor representing the buyers who breached the agreement. The defendant buyers, the Hobecks, gave the defendant realtor, Withey Sheppard Associates, a check for $3,000 as a deposit on the purchase price of the property but told the realtor that the check would not be made good until later. The record reveals that the sellers were told by the realtor that it “had a cheek for $3,000” as deposit, bnt that the sellers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mintz v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Hall v. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
- McCulley v. RiversMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Van Wie v. Fidelity Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Battle v. BattjesMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mickam v. Joseph Louis Palace TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- National Trout Festival, Inc. v. CannonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Howard & Howard Attorneys Pllc v. JabbourMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Alexander v. UDV North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Steinberg v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.