Legal Opinion
Mickam v. Joseph Louis Palace Trust
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 1, 1994No. 92-77324PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PHILIP SEAVER TITLE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDMUNDS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Mauricio and Kathleen Mickam and their company, U-Wash of Pontiac, Inc., 1 brought suit against Defendants, alleging that they have been damaged as a result of their purchase of property encumbered by outstanding federal and state tax liens. Defendants include: Joseph Louis Palace Trust; Victoria Palace and Paul Palace, Cotrustees of the Trust; Philip R. Seaver Title Company; the United States;…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wormsbacher v. Phillip R Seaver Title Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Erickson's Flooring & Supply Co. v. Tembec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Kesling v. KeslingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Rankin v. Brian Lavan & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- G & B Investments, Inc. v. Henderson (In Re Evans)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.