Legal Opinion

McCulley v. Rivers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 8PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Chester, J., presiding. Bill by Irving G. McCulley against Addie Rivers for the specific performance of a land contract. Defendant filed a cross-bill to rescind the contract on the. ground of fraud. From a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Plaintiff’s bill of complaint was filed to enforce specific performance of a land contract dated January 14, 1915, in which defendant agreed to sell and convey to him a parcel of land in the city of Detroit known as No. 48 Adams avenue east, for the sum of $15,000, payable $100 down and the balance upon delivery of the deed with abstract of title on or before February 15, 1915, or as soon thereafter as conveyance could be perfected. The instrument is a short and plain land contract, the only variation from standard form being a provision that:

*419“The vendor agrees that Walter C. Woolley is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WerkheiserMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Veasey v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Parks v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wells v. WoodOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Huizenga v. Withey Sheppard AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. De Blouw v. Ramm & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Matter of Estate of FranzkowiakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API