Legal Opinion

Mintz v. Jacob

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Samuel Mintz against Ben B. Jacob for fraud. Judgment for defendant on motion to quash the writ. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Hooker, j.

Claiming that defendant had aided and abetted one Rappapord in securing, through false pretenses, from the plaintiff, a sum of money to be used by the latter in redeeming certain alleged diamonds, then in pawn to the defendant, plaintiff brought assumpsit under 3 Comp. Laws, § 10421, on September 8, 1909, commencing the action by capias. The writ was afterward, and on October 4, 1909, quashed for failure to file a declaration. A voluntary nonsuit was thereupon submitted to by plaintiff, but the order was not entered. On October 7, 1909, a new and similar action was begun, whereupon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hallett v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Citizens' State Bank v. McGraft Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Morris v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Willard v. ShekellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Mertz v. MertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Viaene v. MikelMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API