Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Estate of Heimbach

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1992No. 78750PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellees’ motion to dismiss is denied with prejudice to its reargument. 12 O.S.1991 Supp. § 653 provides that a motion for new trial must be filed within ten days after the decision is rendered. Appellant’s motion to modify, which was filed within ten days after the filing of the judgment, but more than ten days after its pronouncement, is not a timely post-judgment motion that would extend the appeal time until after the disposition of the motion. Appellees’ motion to dismiss is nonetheless denied. This court will permit review of the underlying judgment. This is so because the changes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poafpybitty v. Skelly Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Isbell v. State ex rel. Retirement & Pension Board of the Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Bushert v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Corbit v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Aven v. ReehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API