Legal Opinion

Corbit v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 23, 1995No. 82733PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment. Because the order appealed from is on a form titled “Court Minute”, and we have not been furnished with an order of the trial court meeting the form for appealable orders required by the recent statutory changes, we dismiss the appeal as premature.

The trial was for back-due child support, modification of child support, and contempt. The court modified child support, and determined the amount owed by Defendant Williams to the State of Oklahoma for A.F.D.C. support expended by the State. It determined that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Markwell v. Whinery's Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Manning v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Mansell v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Aven v. ReehSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. BENEFIEL v. BOULTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. Marriage of Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. ALEXANDER v. ALEXANDERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. LAUBACH v. LAUBACHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
  5. SCOTT v. FOSTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API