Legal Opinion
Bushert v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 20, 1996No. 85395PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
The issues which Bushert’s quest for the appeal’s dismissal tenders are: (1) If the losing party’s lawyer assists in the preparation of the order disposing of the matter taken under advisement, does such participation require counsel to monitor the case filings in the court clerk’s office for the occurrence of the appealable event (the order’s filing)? and (2) Is the court clerk statutorily required to mail to all parties of record file-stamped copies of orders that memorialize matters taken under advisement? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
Because the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- GRISHAM v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Tidemark Exploration, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.