Legal Opinion

Aven v. Reeh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1994No. 82865Published

1Opinion of the Court

878 P.2d 1069 (1994)

Joshua A. AVEN, Appellant,

v.

Richard L. REEH and Dr. Paul Inbody, Appellees.

No. 82865.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 19, 1994.

Joshua A. Aven, pro se.

Joseph R. Farris, Jody R. Nathan, Feldman, Hall, Franden, Woodard & Farris, Tulsa, for appellee Inbody.

Charles O. Hanson, Richard K. Holmes, Tulsa, for appellee Reeh.

SUMMERS, Justice.

The issue here is the timeliness of Plaintiff's appeal. Defendants claim the appeal came to this Court too late. We conclude that it came too early, and dismiss the appeal for prematurity.

Plaintiff brought a tort action in the District Court.…

Also in this document: Dissent · Opala; Dissent · Simms; Concurrence.

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API