Aven v. Reeh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
878 P.2d 1069 (1994)
Joshua A. AVEN, Appellant,
v.
Richard L. REEH and Dr. Paul Inbody, Appellees.
No. 82865.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 19, 1994.
Joshua A. Aven, pro se.
Joseph R. Farris, Jody R. Nathan, Feldman, Hall, Franden, Woodard & Farris, Tulsa, for appellee Inbody.
Charles O. Hanson, Richard K. Holmes, Tulsa, for appellee Reeh.
SUMMERS, Justice.
The issue here is the timeliness of Plaintiff's appeal. Defendants claim the appeal came to this Court too late. We conclude that it came too early, and dismiss the appeal for prematurity.
Plaintiff brought a tort action in the District Court.…
Also in this document: Dissent · Opala; Dissent · Simms; Concurrence.
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.