Legal Opinion

Klemko v. Ryer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1931No. Docket No. 7508PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action for damages.

The case involves an intersection collision between plaintiff’s and defendant’s automobiles. On April 27, 1928, at the hour of 1:30 A. M. plaintiff, respondent herein, was driving his automobile in a westerly direction along Post Street toward Larkin. At said time and place, defendant drove and operated an automobile in a northerly direction on Larkin Street. The complaint alleges that defendant so drove and •operated his machine that it collided with the car operated by plaintiff, in consequence of which he was seriously injured. A jury awarded plaintiff damages in the sum…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dullanty v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Sheets v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Tyson v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Jackson v. the Lactein Co.California Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gayton v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Kellner v. WitteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Napoli v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Soares v. BarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Fox v. RaveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API