Soares v. Barson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
These two actions consolidated for trial were brought by plaintiffs for damages on account of personal injuries sustained by them by reason of being struck by the automobile of defendant.
In some particulars the evidence was conflicting but in view of the verdict of the jury we may fairly infer ti^e following to have been the facts:
Plaintiffs, who were riding in the car of Soares, were proceeding northerly along the highway between Napa and St. Helena, about ten o’clock on the evening of May 29, 1934. At this time and place plaintiffs discovered a flat tire on the left rear wheel and drove to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Linforth v. S.F. Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Straten v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duff v. Schaefer Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Jones v. BayleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- Mardesich v. C. J. Hendry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942