Legal Opinion

Tyson v. Burton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1930No. Docket No. 4226PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MB. JUSTICE PLUMMEB Delivered the Opinion op the Court.

The plaintiff had judgment in an action to recover damages for injuries suffered to his person, and also to his property, resulting from an automobile collision. From this judgment the defendant appeals.

The allegations of the complaint are that the injury to the plaintiff was caused solely by the negligence of the defendant. The answer denies the allegations of the complaint and charges that any injury suffered by the plaintiff was due to his own negligence.

No issue is made as to the amount of damages awarded the plaintiff. The collision…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Manley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Koch v. ElkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Raggio v. MalloryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Sullivan v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Magnuson v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Fortier v. HoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API