Legal Opinion

Gayton v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1932No. Docket No. 940PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County, wherein the respondent recovered judgment in the sum of $7,000 damages resulting from the death of her husband, Jose G. Gayton, caused by his being struck by an automobile truck belonging to the appellant corporation and driven by William Nighswonger on a public street in the city of Brawley on the morning of January 1, 1931. Appellants also attempt to appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The facts of the case may be summarized as follows: The Pacific Fruit Express Company, a corporation, employed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. Leong FookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Rich v. ErvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Cain v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Carter v. BesseyUtah Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API