State v. Bey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
In this appeal, Bey advances twenty-two propositions of law. (See Appendix, infra.) We have considered each of Bey’s propositions of law, independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against mitigating factors, and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Bey’s convictions and the sentence of death.
I. Other Acts Issues
A. Proposition of Law I
In proposition of law I, Bey asserts that the trial court erred by admitting “other acts” evidence' under Evid.R. 404(B) that Bey murdered Mihas. Bey argues that the trial court’s…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.