State v. Walker
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
I
Appellant, in his first proposition of law, essentially asserts that the evidence presented at trial did not attain the requisite degree of proof needed to support his conviction. Our consideration of this proposition is limited to an examination of the record at the trial to determine whether the evidence presented, “which, if believed, would convince the average mind of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Atkins v. State (1926), 115 Ohio St. 542, 546. This review is thus confined to a determination of whether there was substantial evidence. State v. Sheppard (1956), 165 Ohio…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Raymond Walker, Cross-Appellant v. Ted Engle, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- State v. HeinishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.