Legal Opinion

Baker v. Peck

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1934No. Civ. 5065PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff against defendant for recovery of compensatory and punitive damages resulting from a battery committed by defendant upon plaintiff on May 15, 1933, in the city of Merced. The plaintiff in the action alleges damages of $5-,000 for an assault with premeditation and malice, and for exemplary damages of $50,000.

The answer of defendant admitted the striking of plaintiff, but alleged that no damage was done to plaintiff • thereby and further alleged that he struck in self-defense. A jury was impaneled and a general verdict was returned in favor of plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Siemsen v. Oakland, San Leandro, & Haywards Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Fererira v. SilveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Sherwood v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Young v. HechtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  3. Roth v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Evans v. GaisfordUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Building Trades Council of Reno & Vicinity v. ThompsonNevada Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API