Legal Opinion

Young v. Hecht

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 13, 1979No. 50,046PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Spencer, J.:

This is an appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of defendants. The sole issue is whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Plaintiff’s theories for recovery of damages, both actual and punitive, are predicated on fraud, breach of contract, negligence, outrageous conduct, oppression, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of DR 7-104(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility on the part of defendant Hecht. The other defendants are partners with Hecht in the general practice of law.

At the outset, we note the rules relating to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Hill v. WillmottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Roberts v. SaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  3. Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  4. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API